Posts

Employee’s duty of loyalty to employer

California The duty of loyalty arises not from a contract but from a relationship-here, the relationship of principal and agent. Agency is “the fiduciary relationship that arises when one person (a `principal’) manifests assent to another person (an `agent’) that the agent shall act on the principal’s behalf and subject to the principal’s control, and […]

Employment contract services

Jeffrey Easley has reviewed, drafted, and negotiated hundreds of employment-related contracts (employment, performance, talent, separation/severance, stock option and award, non-compete, trade secret, confidentiality, etc.) and resolved and litigated many contract disputes. Hundreds of agreements reviewed and negotiated – millions of dollars recovered and saved The review and consultation process for many types of contracts takes […]

Intentional infliction of emotional distress (California and Colorado)

California A cause of action for intentional infliction of emotional distress exists when there is “`”`(1) extreme and outrageous conduct by the defendant with the intention of causing, or reckless disregard of the probability of causing, emotional distress; (2) the plaintiff’s suffering severe or extreme emotional distress; and (3) actual and proximate causation of the […]

Copyright protection for music compilations (9th Cir)

From Skidmore v. ZEPPELIN, 952 F. 3d 1051 – Court of Appeals, 9th Circuit 2020 I. THE 1909 COPYRIGHT ACT The world of copyright protection for music changed dramatically during the twentieth century and those changes dictate our analysis here. The baseline issue we address is the scope of Wolfe’s copyright in the unpublished composition […]

Quantum meruit (California and Colorado)

Implied promise to pay for services rendered California Quantum meruit refers to the well-established principle that “the law implies a promise to pay for services performed under circumstances disclosing that they were not gratuitously rendered.” (Long v. Rumsey (1938) 12 Cal.2d 334, 342, 84 P.2d 146.) To recover in quantum meruit, a party need not […]

United Pentecostal Church v. California

SOUTH BAY UNITED PENTECOSTAL CHURCH, ET AL.,v.GAVIN NEWSOM, GOVERNOR OF CALIFORNIA, ET AL. No. 19A1044. Supreme Court of the United States. May 29, 2020. ON APPLICATION FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF. The application for injunctive relief presented to JUSTICE KAGAN and by her referred to the Court is denied. JUSTICE THOMAS, JUSTICE ALITO, JUSTICE GORSUCH, and JUSTICE […]

Speak with an attorney today

X